George Washington is a great leader. He made good decisions and won the loyalty of people's hearts. The government that leads by George Washing went through the messy progress of creating a new strong government, which is " the argument".


For me, James Madison is an admirable person for standing out and telling everyone his opinion of creating a new government. I believe that there are many people don't want to change from one operational mode to another because they get too used to what they've been doing and get lazy to change. At that time, the United States needed a different mode to be strengthened. James Madison was the first one who put out of the point and gave his ideas about it. The United States needed to use the large republic to divide the majority power and let " the people" be the owner of this country because the majority is not the answer.

I  really begrudge about America sometimes, because it is a free country and people can be the owners of this country. Democracy is better than capitalism at some point, but democracy system needs strict legal institutions and extremely depends on the election Champaign workers. George Washington was voted as one of the greatest presidents in the United States, people make great decisions sometimes but not always. Isn't Obama one of the voting failures because he made this country in huge debt even though his contributions can not be erased? Probably. If we compare him to the two election Champaign workers this country has now, he is probably better.  


I believe that most of the people acknowledge George Washington is the best president in the history. He and James Madison did a good job of the new government, which made the state constitutions powerful governments transferred to a strong national government. I think that is the reason why America calls " the United States". Madison gave a suggestion of making the legislative branch to two instead of one, soon, " the people" became " the power". After all, they made a clear statement that it was a creature of the people at large and not a compact among the states.
Base on what I learned from this book, this chapter, it tells me about how people are the dominators of the United States. America has been running this rule system better than any countries else because it is the most powerful country in the world. Which proved that James Madison and George Washington's decision of making the country changed was right. Their courage was demandable but it also showed that people trust George Washington and he and Madison made a good partner together.


After the majority divided by large republic, Madison realized that they need all the power together to create a unique diffusion of power. However, George Washington and Madison lost the faith of revolution, Madison lost, but the constitution institutionalized  a unique form of share sovereignty. It also was a  victory of the debate because they made the country changed in a good way.
The debate on Tuesday I watched wasn't as good as what I thought. If people follow Trump's thought, it is nothing like what ancient China did, "seclusion". If a country doesn't communicate good enough with other countries, what matter how powerful this country is now, this country is stepping on a destructing road. Even though he has racial discrimination, it doesn’t mean that he can't stop other religions people come into this country, because one day he will realize that he needs those people.

If people do what Hilary wants, this country will "train" a huge group of lazy people because the government pays for everything. I acknowledge that to be a good leader is to help the people but it doesn't mean to foster "greenhouse flowers" because those people won't do anything. What's the purpose of doing this? Nothing. So, this method won't work. If the government do something like raise up the price of scholarship higher, it might work better, at least it tells people, if you work harder, you earn more.

President Debate

After I watched the President Debate, I'm on Trump's side. In past seven years, President Obama already made a failure of being in a huge debt by maxing the tax up to the people and if Hilary continues doing the same thing as President Obama, this country will for sure go on an extinct road.

There are two points that I really put my eyes on.

First one, it's the immigration problem. Hilary's suggestions are making all the illegal immigration become legal and mainly support all the refugees. However, Trump's opinions are different from Hilary's. He advocates to make good control of border Management Agency and promote the relationship with Mexico and other surrounding countries. I agree with Trump, because American is a country full of all kinds of races, and sure this country needs to be cleaned up a little bit by letting everyone come in. An important thing that impacts this country's security is drug control. The drug has been one of the biggest issues in America, one way to avoid from drugs is to be stricter to the outsider because no one knows what they will bring, once the security finds something that might attack this country, that person will never allow to come to America. Trump makes a good suggestion on bringing outside stuff into the country is, if people want to bring stuff outside, they need to pay high tax, or they can't. The result of this situation is seldom or no one will want to bring stuff to America which protects this country.


The second one, and the last one, it's gun controlling. Hilary and Trump both agree with no guns but Trump is more democratic than Hilary that he wants to control guns from the force of dark which will attack the people and the country. In my view, there is nothing should ever be erased because everything has a right to stay, even a gun. Gun's negative and positive ways depend on how people use them. Trump wants to protect the country especially the people from the gangsters and all the illegal ways use guns, and I agree with him. Because some people use guns in a good way, it shouldn't be wipe just because of  the bad using behaviors. People use guns to hunt, to protect, and to fight, if the next president forbids gun using, he or she will soon be fired.

To be honest, I don't like either one of them, but compare Trump to Hilary, I like Trump better because he seems more thoughtful and more logical. For some reason, Hilary gives me a feeling of blindly follow President Obama's failure and her own desires. A president is a leader of a country, if that president only works people for his or her desires, the people will not accept and that's not good for anyone or anything. Even though Trump's attitude was not really straight to my heart, but he still wins it anyway.

Transgender Pregnancy

Women are those who can give births to children. However, there is more and more male transgender who were made female, choose to conceive and some of them can still be fertilized. The phenomenon is very rare. Because most people who want a kid will choose a surrogate mother rather than become fertilized. I disagree with transgender pregnancy because we were born as one of the greatest God's creations, which is the only one that made by His image, even though no one is perfect but we can try to be close to perfect through God's strength. So, there is no need to change one piece of our bodies, especially our genders.


In my opinion, it is really hard to explain to the child that your dad gave birth to you,  and it is selfish to become a transgender and have a transgender pregnancy because that is not responsible to the kids. When the kid gets older, learn more about biology, how should Evan who is the transgender parent, explain to his kid? It might mess up a child's view of human and society. Because what should that child call Evan, father or mother?  It's really confusing to a little kid because he or she might think both male and female can give birth to a child and that is a wrong view to this world. To put in a serious consideration, it might also cause some types of psychology problem to the child and that child might get mock from other people, just because of she or she's parent, is transgender, that hurts.



Talk about other family member of a transgender. I believe there are most of us that disagree with LGBT revolution. If my brother or sister become a transgender, I will feel like I lose one of my family members. Because I don't consider a female brother or a male sister. I don't know what Evan's sister feel when she wrote the article about how her transgender brother pregnancy, but if I'm his sister, I will feel shame from everywhere because that is against of the social morality and God's intention. People's social conscience are getting more and more unsubstantial than before, and that's why more and more people join in LGBT revolution.


We should be who we are and be agree with how we were made. No one is perfect, but no one should be embarrassed or escape it by using any methods. We all know that our generation's level is improving like one light year per second but there are still many things that should not be changed by authority except God's word. People have been separated from God for many years from the transgender pregnancy, take out bible verse from textbooks, remove everyone who's Christian from the government cause our society becomes worse silently, we should review what we did and doing in the future.


My Brother the Mom? TIME preaches the moral revolution.

The "Good Parent" vs. the "Get-Real Parent"

This world is complicated and dangerous, many people die an unnatural death or get killed everyday. However, this world is also full of temptation by everything and anything around us. If we can't control ourselves good enough, we will easily fall into this giant "Pandora's box". To make a better world, teenagers should be positively educated by good parents. The definition of "good parents" to me, is teaching their children the positive and negative things in the world without showing them how to do. Because parents are always good examples to their children and they are also  first teachers of children. Before children go to school, children will do what their parents do without knowing right and wrong.

There are three important periods to teach a kid to me. First, it's teaches them the negative and positive things before they officially share their lives with other kids. Second, it's before a kid goes to a high school. Third, it's before a teenager go to a college. The most significant period is the last one because at that time, teenagers do have some concepts of right and wrong but they still don't understand them fully. Teenagers are not adults, they will be easily tempted by all kinds of temptation. That's why the last period is the period that most crimes happen and creates lots of fallen teenagers. Because teenagers are emotional and vulnerable, even if their parents don't use a good attitude to tell them, they will easily fall. It can explain that why is there some " good kids" go astray in alcoholism, doing drugs, or some other criminal behavior.

Parents should be responsible for their children.I believe that none parents want to see their children become fallen by one false idea. As a result, I suggest that before teenager goes to college, parents should sit down and talk to their kids kindly, seriously, and sincerely. If both parents do that, the kid will value the things might happen in the future more wisely. That is what " good parents" should do, be responsible to their children even when they are turning 18 and going to college.In my opinion, "get real parents" are parents that can take or afraid to take responsibility of their children. To possibly prevent children from being alcoholism is not showing them on yourselves or tell them how to do it responsibly but telling them and showing the damage from doing that.
People become more and more lawlessness these days, how should this society get better? By generation and generation, the kids get worse than parents but no one can help them. If there is a Christian president in the US, will the lawlessness people become fewer? Will the " get real parents" get fewer? Maybe parents can bear such a heavy burden for their children, but who should teach the teenagers? Will God do it for His child without every children putting faith in  Him?

The "Good Parents" vs. the "Get Real Parents"