A Boy or a Girl?

About two weeks ago, I read a news about a Chinese grandma killed her granddaughter. As you already read my blog about the drop of the one-child policy rule in China, you probably know the reason why the grandma did that.

The newspaper simply summarized the process how she killed her granddaughter. She took the baby away while her daughter in law was taking a nap, went to a stairs interlayer, dropped the baby on the ground, step on the baby's head until she died, and then threw the baby in the garbage can. The grandma went back to her daughter in law's room at the hospital, acted like nothing happened, and without feeling guilty. Her daughter in law asked her about the baby, she said, I killed her. The newspaper didn't say anything about how the mother's feeling at that time, but it did mention that the family doesn't want to put the grandma in jail because they understand how much she wants a grandson.

After I read the news, I felt angry and depressed for how much the policy and tradition changed people. It makes people think that it’s ok to kill a baby for its gender, it's ok to kill daughters in law if they don't have a boy baby in her womb, it's ok to treat granddaughters different than grandsons for them being female, and it's ok to pamper grandsons or sons because they are males that they have the ability to carry on the family line. Why should gender be the line to evaluate a human being's value?  Why should the gender's difference be the motive of crime?

If China wants to stand firm in its position in the world, the first thing the government should do it’s to change peoples' minds. As many of you can see, Chinese do many strange things than you guys. Maybe I should say not only Chinese but many people think that Chinese are rude and stiff. I agree with that too. Yes, China is developing very fast from every way but the people in China aren't improving their morality as fast as its country which makes people from other countries think Chinese are not educated enough.

In my personal perspective, China focuses too much on its value but forgets a country is constituted by its people. People in China don't get good welfare like the Americans when they need help from the government deeply. Their children need to be educated, need to be fed, need to have clothes to wear, and even need places to stay. I rather our government uses the money for those in some struggles instead of using the money for some technology uses that we already have.

Talk about tradition, from Mao's generation, good means everyone is good not any single one. I admit that it’s impossible to be fair for everyone but at least make the balance seems like on the same level. No matter how the government changes the policy, the tragedies will happen. To be most likely prevent from those, change peoples' minds first, then there will be no needs to change the policy.

Mice in the Dark

A strong, solid defense is usually formed by a puissant offense. Enemies won't retreat only by a group of armies who only knows how to defense but a group of armies who actually knows how to fight for their authority and dignity. Inaction brings regression. Regression gives enemies chances to step on your head until it becomes powder and gone with the wind. Those sacred mice in the dark see this shame happens with a trembling body, even pee on the ground but forget the humiliation when the new dawn comes without feeling their souls had just been downtrodden.

The mice still live their lives in their regular schedules, numb themselves from what they deserve for being cowardly, backing more steps from their bottom line, and sadly can't help mocking themselves to coordinate others. Mice are mice, so flabby that easy to destroy by only using one finger. Don't even have any courage to stand out for their only protector, and themselves. Enemies seize every opportunity to slowly destroy their minds, and accomplish the final goal, erase the protector on the earth and grant themselves the position that supposes to be defended and should not be defiled.

Finally, the mice make the decision to fight, the enemies are already too strong for them to reach victory. There are two ways for the mice to live, be slaves of the enemies or strike first and win. Mice regret their spineless and begin to live like walking dead, complain about how this world is so unfair to them, why people are so rude to them. Why? Ask yourself. You know the answer, stop complaining, go tell the world that no one can be disrespectful to what you believe.

Yes, compare to God, a human is easy to be destroyed. Those people who call themselves as Christian, how can you act like nothing when someone is talking dirty to your belief? The reason why people don't respect your belief is caused by your action, by how much you put your heart in your God. If you give an inch to those heretics, they will reach out of a yard. Before they move one foot above you and your God, step before them, tell them not to make fun of Christianity seriously, and tell them about God without anger but a faithful heart.

Although I am not a Christian, I can still see God's power from many records, and true. When the government removed everything from the Bible, and about God, America begins its downhill path. Before they made the decision, people control themselves better, at least for the authority of the government but when it got took out, people are like crazy beasts, or birds finally got freedom from a small cage.

Maybe before blame other for the crime, Christians should look at themselves. Are you really surrendered to God? If you are, why didn't you fight for your God when someone made fun on your belief the first time? Now you talk about how impenetrable people are now, how this world is going wrong, where were you when you saw the divergent at first?

I'm not being offensive to Christians.

Public Policies

The Scandal of CCTV has been spreading in recent years, the high-level personnel is also adjusted frequently. Recently, some oversea medias explode the revelations about CCTV has a major personnel change. Chenxi Nie, who just took office as CCTV director for a year and a half, will be transferred to the SARFT(State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television) director. The new CCTV director will be taken over by the deputy minister the propaganda department of the central committee of the CPC Junhai Jing.

Junhai Jing was the secondary of the Radio Movies Television shows and News Public Station of China. He was born in December 1960 and became a member of the Communist Party of China in 1982. Jing positions are on-job postgraduate, master of engineering, and professor. He was the standing committee of Shanxi for the Communist Party, director of the Propaganda Department of a Provincial Party Committee, vice governor of Shanxi province people's government which replaced by Chenxin Nie this year, and so on. Jing is now the vice minister of the propaganda department of the central committee of the Communist Party of China.

Before Jing started his road of politics, he was a teacher in his early year after he graduated from the University of Technology in Xian for three years from 1985 to 1988, then he became an associate professor in 1992. Actually, he became an area tube member when he temporally transferred to Xian to be in charged of attracting investment and business administration in 1991.

One of the reasons why Jing Junhai was the former Minister of Propaganda Department of Shanxi is because Shanxi is where Xi's father started his life journey, and it's also where Xi was trained to be an educated youth. As a result, Jing appeared in public as deputy minister of the Central Propaganda Department of the CPC, attracted the special attention of the media from Xi's unconditional trusting. It sounds funny to me but it's reasonable for Xi to trust Jing because Jing used to work in Shanxi as a local official, and Shanxi is where Xi had many memories and experienced when he was young.

It wasn’t a surprised to know from a newspaper that the new CCTV director Jing is concerned importantly by Jinping Xi. Once he took over the Shenzhen, he finally recognized The central propaganda officer for Xi, which estimated that he still has promoted space. Since the collapse of Zhou Yongkang, the internal scandals of CCTV had been exposing, CCTV has been in the personnel shock period.  Xi Jinping had realized that since he controlled regime, Jiang's Standing Committee, Liu Yunshan, will be controlling the propaganda system because Jiang and Liu have been keeping a complicit relationship with each other. However, they also deliberately distorted Xi to make him seems like a left right and “cultural revolution” image successfully from Xi’s attacked governance when Xi was considering making the appropriate treatment to Liu at the same time.

It's always hard to clearly know what is going on with public policies. Sometimes I concern about the future of my country by knowing what those political people are doing from medias. Xi did put heart in advocating anti-corruption, but the action that he made Jing became the new director make me draw a question mark to our new chairman. For some people, Xi is way better than Trump, but in some way, Trump is more a better one for me.

Hamilton?

If Trump didn't tweet that, will "Hamilton" really be a problem? I don't see it is a problem between whether Trump or the cast did it right but a problem about how people become these days.

In the first paragraph, the article points out that people now accept vulgarity and ungracious  instead of courteous and solemn in a speech in public. I don’t understand why the author states it so obviously and even points out President Obama for it. In my personal perspective, the way a person speak it's one way to see how this person is. If a person if speak vulgar in a speech in public, how is he going to speak to friends and families or how is he going to treat them? I have the same agreement with the writer that maybe Trump shouldn't be the one step in this situation but we can see how much have Americans changed or even the world changed, from his action and people's responses.

In Luke chapter six, verse forty- five, " a good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and an evil man brings evil things out in the evil stored up of his heart. For the mouth speaks what the heart if full of." In my opinion, vulgarity in speech is part of speaking evil. Based on what I read and my limited understanding, people now worship the evil instead of good? Furthermore, people choose to accept evil things instead of goods? Those who "attack" Trump and the cast see themselves as the real judges of good and evil, unfortunately, the real devils are themselves, probably.

There's another side I see from it which I still not on the same boat with the author is, I don't think it is a good solution to let the cast be what they are. The cast is the one we found out, so there definitely are more like them. If Trump didn't stand out for Mike Pence, those people like the cast will be more rampant than before and there will be more Mike Pence in the future. At that time, people will finally realize how serious this is and complain about this all the time but forget who actually fought for them in the past that got attacked by themselves so-called "speech vulgar in public".

Lastly, there are always gaps between everything, not only art and religion. Your parents see things different than you sometimes, right? The video game you like can't please every customer, right? Same as art and religion. Some art, like movies, books, pictures, and even speaking, can't please those in religions always. Religions somehow limit the imaginations and prospects of some artists in someway, no one can prevent it to happen. Let's make this problem small, sometimes if the problem doesn't affect your life that much, why not give a little mercy? If you really don't like the movie or don’t agree with a religion, then step away from it.

In a conclusion for above, people are getting more sensitive about what's happening and offensive to those who seem attacking them. I can't say that's wrong or bad, I can only say, put a little faith in your next president and be thankful that Hilary didn't win.